Mystery Surrounds Gonçalves’ Absence
- Updated: March 15, 2014
The absence of New England Revolution captain Jose Goncalves from the club’s gameday 18 on Saturday at Philadelphia was a curious one by any measure. But there is conflicting information regarding the circumstances that led to the situation.
During the match, veteran soccer journalist Ives Galarcep revealed via Twitter that Goncalves’ absence was due to the captain’s unwillingness to set aside contract squabbles, and that the decision not to include the 2013 Defender of the Year was made earlier in the week.
Where is Jose Goncalves? Sources tell me Heaps told Goncalves to (A) snap out of contract-unhappiness funk or (B) not play. He chose B. #MLS
— Ives Galarcep (@SoccerByIves) March 15, 2014
The Heaps to Goncalves ultimatum did NOT go down today. Happened during the week. Defender of the Year clearly unhappy w/his contract
— Ives Galarcep (@SoccerByIves) March 15, 2014
Goncalves was present at training on Tuesday, but was not spotted at training on Wednesday, which appears to confirm that the decision to exclude Goncalves from the gameday 18 was, indeed, made days prior to Saturday’s clash.
But according to a source close to Goncalves, the 2013 Defender of the Year was never given an ultimatum.
“Jose was not presented with an ultimatum about playing and he wanted to play for the team in the game against Philadelphia,” the source said. “He strongly supports the team and wants to help them in any way he can.”
Following the game, Heaps was asked about Goncalves’ absence on the 18, but he declined to give specifics.
“Our focus is to put the best players on the field for this game,” Heaps said. “We tried to draw up a gameplan for this game. We wanted to put the best players that we could to get through this match.”
Prior to Saturday’s game, Goncalves had played every single minute of every MLS match for the Revolution. He was originally brought to New England via loan from Swiss side Sion FC, which agreed to bankroll the majority of Goncalves’ salary in 2013.
But after the Revolution exercised the purchase option contained in the loan agreement, Goncalves expressed his displeasure with the terms of his 2014 contract, even though it reportedly made him the second-highest paid defender in MLS.
He saw sporadic action during the preseason (185 minutes), but started in last week’s 4-0 season-opening loss in Houston, which marked the Revolution’s worst defeat in nearly four years.
Robert
March 16, 2014 at 12:10 am
Unbelievable.
Peter
March 16, 2014 at 11:55 am
Hey there Mike Burns promised that he was going to do something about Goncalves contract @ the season Ticket welcome event @ Gillette last week
Chris B
March 16, 2014 at 2:39 pm
Regardless of what is really going on, it is clearly a major unnecessary distraction. Hopefully a solution arises and the Revs can get back to their winning ways sooner rather than later and I have faith that they will. Once Rowe and Nguyen can get on the field together I think the Revs will be firing on all cylinders. As I recall, that is what it took to get the wins coming last season as well.
BWG
March 16, 2014 at 6:26 pm
Ask yourselves this: why is it that sooner or later experienced talented players end up on the wrong side of this ‘coach’ and end up being benched for one reason or another?
HenkRvL
March 17, 2014 at 8:23 am
Do we know what are Goncalves’ gripes are? On the surface, it doesn’t seem like he has anything to complain about…
Chris B
March 17, 2014 at 6:44 pm
Well, we don’t know 100% because MLS (especially the Revs) has very little transparency, but the prevailing thought is that while he was on loan, Goncalves was making money both from MLS and his parent club FC Sion. Now that the Revs exercised his purchase option, he is no longer making any money from FC Sion and his overall salary has likely gone down despite his cap hit for the Revs rising by a pretty significant number. It’s a pretty complex and certainly stressful situation.